|
Institute for |
|
|
There are two possible binocular
mechanisms for the detection of motion in depth. One is based on disparity changes over time
and the other is based on inter-ocular velocity differences. It has
previously been shown that disparity changes over time can produce the
perception of motion in depth. However, existing psychophysical and
physiological data are inconclusive as to whether inter-ocular velocity
differences play a role in motion in depth perception. We studied this issue
in two different ways. In the first study, we used
frontoparallel motion adaptation. If inter-ocular velocity differences
contribute to motion in depth, we would expect that discriminability of
direction of motion in depth should be improved after adaptation to
frontoparallel motion. This is because an inter-ocular velocity difference is
a comparison between two monocular frontoparallel motion signals, and because
frontoparallel speed discrimination improves after motion adaptation. We
found that adapting to frontoparallel motion does improve both frontoparallel
speed discrimination and motion-in-depth direction discrimination. No
improvement would be expected if only disparity change over time contributes
to motion in depth. For details see Fernandez & Farell (2005b). In the second study, we used the motion
aftereffect, the illusory motion of static patterns that follows adaptation
to real motion. We induced a differential motion aftereffect to the two eyes
(i.e., we adapted only one eye) and then tested for motion in depth in a
stationary random-dot pattern seen with both eyes. This differential
translational motion aftereffect produced a strong perception of motion in
depth. Details can be found in Fernandez
& Farell (2005c). Together, our results strongly suggest
that (1) pure inter-ocular velocity differences can produce motion in depth,
and (2) the illusory changes in position from the motion aftereffect are
generated relatively late in the visual hierarchy, after binocular
combination. |